Monday, October 6, 2014

Facebook and Your "Real" Name

Recently my Facebook newsfeed has been buzzing about the company's enforcement of its official naming policy, specifically targeting a community of drag queens. Facebook's looming threat to delete the social profiles of these individuals if they refused to comply gained a lot of buzz - and people used Facebook itself to circulate their dissatisfaction. These performers shared their experiences and eventually received an apology. (Facebook Chief Product Officer Chris Cox's apology can be read here.)


Not everyone is necessarily on the same page with why they disagree. Confusion abounds in the general population about what it means to be a drag queen, so not everyone is going to understand the intricacies of that identity or why it was so insulting.

My view: I recently graduated with an English major specializing in Ethnic Literature, so I talked a lot about "marginalized identities." I see a big company yielding it's power to become a gatekeeper of forms of identity expression. Telling individuals that the identity they can privilege is the one recognized by the government institution clearly leaves people with multiple coexisting identities at a disadvantage. But even if you don't look at this way, it seems Facebook saw how the tide of public opinion would shift based on another thing:

Social Media that tells me how to be social (and how to identify socially) is NOT good social media.


I think in the beginning, Facebook's limitations of customization created a cleaner, easier to use look, that gave it legitimacy. MySpace lost credibility because it was too open to customization, which quickly became cluttered, unattractive, and difficult to use. The lack of insistence that your profile coincide with a verifiable identity decreased accountability and made profiles susceptible to spam.



Facebook's atmosphere insisted on legitimacy and use of "real" identities in a way that comforted people. It even facilitated people sharing themselves in a way that other people really wanted to see: your real name, real pictures of your face. You only friend people you actually know.

However, the performers using their stage names in their profiles were using identities that corresponded with real life. Pen names, nicknames, etc., still correspond with the spirit of connecting profiles with real people. I don't doubt that there will continue to be issues of this kind as the creation of social media profiles intersects with highly contested issues of identity.

4 comments:

  1. Thank you for bringing this topic up, I was thinking about Facebook and it`s policy`s a lot recently too, some social networks can be great for marketing but when it comes to personal information, seems that people are not always ready to share everything about themselves so i support idea of some space for privacy like "Not specified" fields in sign-up forms.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Facebook's policy change really caused an argument but sometimes it has some reasons I think. In China we have a similar social network exactly like Facebook, but the anonymous accounts becomes a terrible disaster. Advertisements and pornographic service really caused a lot of trouble on that. But anyway if famous people or account use their anonymous account correctly I think Facebook really should not do that.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I completely agree with your idea that a social network that tells people how to construct their social identity is not a good one at all. After all why are drag queens being targeted if a lot of people portray what they aren't via social media anyways especially facebook? Catfish anyone? And the creation of not so "real" or "actual identities has been an issue since chat rooms. Remember AOL chat? No one ha any idea who they were really talking to. So the fact that these individuals were marginalized and targeted is just sad. Everyone now at days uses social medai for a purpose and they should be allowed what that purpose is whether it is for personal use, artistic, or business. If they are not hurting anyone in the long run I don't see an issue with it.

    ReplyDelete